In this historical fiction novel, the life of a young girl who is enigmatically crowned Queen to rule beside Henry VIII is explored through the eyes of her girlhood companion turned Lady-in-Waiting. When Cat Tilney is sent to the estate of the dowager Duchess of York to be tutored in the ways of nobility,, she has no idea that Katherine, one of the most savvy and headstrong girls in residence with her, will one day become the Queen of England. As the narrative flashes forward and backward, the reader comes to know the irascible Katherine and follows her throughout her juvenile escapades with the men of the manor to her time as a queen who notoriously cuckolds her husband, the fearsome King Henry. As Katherine and Cat’s stars rise, Katherine becomes ever more secretive and wily, while Cat remains true to her young lover Francis, who was once one of Katherine’s playthings. But when it’s discovered that Katherine took the throne belying her status as a virgin, things become dangerous for both the queen and her serving women, leaving Cat in the position of harboring a horrible secret from the rest of the world. At once suspenseful and evocative, The Confessions of Katherine Howard tells the sordid story of the fifth wife of Henry VIII.
I have to say I thought this book was dreadfully mistitiled. The title would lead you to believe that the book was told from the viewpoint of Katherine Howard when the reality is that the book is told from the viewpoint of Cat Tilney, and most of the action and dialog revolves around her. It makes me a little irritated that every historical fiction author out there wants to write a book about Henry VIII and his ill-fated wives, but what makes me even more frustrated is when a book’s title infers that it’ll cover one subject but really is aiming to cover another. Though I did enjoy most of the book, this nit-pick I had with the title really hampered my enjoyment and suspended my ability to read without prejudice. The book should have been called The Confessions of Katherine’s Howard’s Handmaid.
One of the things I liked about the book was that it revealed a great deal that was previously unknown about Katherine Howard. I had known for some time that she hailed from a politically ambitious family of sycophants, but Katherine’s origins and early history remained opaque to me until I read this book. All I really knew was that she was considered a man-eater, and that she had several affairs throughout both her teenage years and into her days as Queen to Henry. Katherine was portrayed as a rather cold and calculating person who never gave much thought to propriety or appearances. She rather shamelessly strung many men along, and in the end, it was her voracious appetite for carnal pleasures that was her undoing. I can’t say I liked her very much, as she had none of the spunk of Anne Boleyn or the spiritual long-suffering as Henry’s first queen, Catherine. As the book was mainly a bystander’s account of her life, I felt more invested in the story of Cat Tilney and her budding relationship with Francis. Cat seemed much more of an everyday person who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I don’t think she wanted to be tied up in Katherine’s fate, but circumstances left those things out of her control, and because of that, she became the final piece in Katherine’s undoing.
Though it first it didn’t really bother me, as the book progressed, the management of the flashbacks became a little obstructive to a smooth reading experience. I never really knew just what period I was reading about, which caused a lot of confusion during certain sections. I would have liked to see some kind of separation by date in the mingling sections, because as it was, whenever I began a new chapter, I was initially lost as to where it fit in in the timeline. I also had a problem with the fact that a lot of the characters’ thoughts were interspersed within the dialog in a rather clumsy way. Someone would be talking, and all of a sudden, quotation marks would be dropped and text would be italicized, with another set of quotations marks picking up right behind it. It was a little irksome to read and I thought it could have been handled in a different and more orderly fashion.
Though I had some obvious problems with this book, I still have to confess that I rather enjoyed the story it told. The writing was simple and direct, which made the intricacies of the plot stand out fully. The crucial information it provided on the early life of Katherine Howard was hugely satisfying and filled in what scant information I had come across regarding this ill-fated queen’s rise to fame. I think those readers who enjoy historical fiction set in early 16th century, and those who like to gobble up anything about Henry VIII’s illustrious wives, would do very well in giving this book a try. Though I do warn there are some caveats, it was still a very interesting read.
I have to say I thought this book was dreadfully mistitiled. The title would lead you to believe that the book was told from the viewpoint of Katherine Howard when the reality is that the book is told from the viewpoint of Cat Tilney, and most of the action and dialog revolves around her. It makes me a little irritated that every historical fiction author out there wants to write a book about Henry VIII and his ill-fated wives, but what makes me even more frustrated is when a book’s title infers that it’ll cover one subject but really is aiming to cover another. Though I did enjoy most of the book, this nit-pick I had with the title really hampered my enjoyment and suspended my ability to read without prejudice. The book should have been called The Confessions of Katherine’s Howard’s Handmaid.
One of the things I liked about the book was that it revealed a great deal that was previously unknown about Katherine Howard. I had known for some time that she hailed from a politically ambitious family of sycophants, but Katherine’s origins and early history remained opaque to me until I read this book. All I really knew was that she was considered a man-eater, and that she had several affairs throughout both her teenage years and into her days as Queen to Henry. Katherine was portrayed as a rather cold and calculating person who never gave much thought to propriety or appearances. She rather shamelessly strung many men along, and in the end, it was her voracious appetite for carnal pleasures that was her undoing. I can’t say I liked her very much, as she had none of the spunk of Anne Boleyn or the spiritual long-suffering as Henry’s first queen, Catherine. As the book was mainly a bystander’s account of her life, I felt more invested in the story of Cat Tilney and her budding relationship with Francis. Cat seemed much more of an everyday person who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I don’t think she wanted to be tied up in Katherine’s fate, but circumstances left those things out of her control, and because of that, she became the final piece in Katherine’s undoing.
Though it first it didn’t really bother me, as the book progressed, the management of the flashbacks became a little obstructive to a smooth reading experience. I never really knew just what period I was reading about, which caused a lot of confusion during certain sections. I would have liked to see some kind of separation by date in the mingling sections, because as it was, whenever I began a new chapter, I was initially lost as to where it fit in in the timeline. I also had a problem with the fact that a lot of the characters’ thoughts were interspersed within the dialog in a rather clumsy way. Someone would be talking, and all of a sudden, quotation marks would be dropped and text would be italicized, with another set of quotations marks picking up right behind it. It was a little irksome to read and I thought it could have been handled in a different and more orderly fashion.
Though I had some obvious problems with this book, I still have to confess that I rather enjoyed the story it told. The writing was simple and direct, which made the intricacies of the plot stand out fully. The crucial information it provided on the early life of Katherine Howard was hugely satisfying and filled in what scant information I had come across regarding this ill-fated queen’s rise to fame. I think those readers who enjoy historical fiction set in early 16th century, and those who like to gobble up anything about Henry VIII’s illustrious wives, would do very well in giving this book a try. Though I do warn there are some caveats, it was still a very interesting read.
About the AuthorSuzannah Dunn is the author of ten previous novels, all of which have been critically acclaimed. She has written three historical novels: The Queen of Subtleties, The Sixth Wife and The Queen’s Sorrow. Visit Suzannah at her website. |
 |
A warm thanks to TLC Book Tours for providing this book for me to read and review. Please continue to follow the tour by visiting these other blogs:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This book was provided as a complimentary review copy.
Posts
18 comments:
I'm glad the title's misrepresentation didn't hamper your enjoyment too much. I'm not sure the book's for me though.
I agree completely about misleading titles. Then again, I'm sort of annoyed by the insistence of historical fiction to be titled merely the name of the book's subject.
For some reason I've never really gotten into the history of Henry VIII or anything related. I completely agree about a mistitle or something along those lines ruining the story.
I enjoy reading about the Tudor court, but I am not sure I could get past the things that bothered you...particularly the flashbacks/timeline issues. It is very frustrating to me when interwoven time periods are not done well. I'm confused enough as it is, I don't need my reading experiences to make me more so :)
I know some readers that gobble up this genre and sub-genre like candy, and chances are I would like it if I read it, but I've never been all that interested. I definitely would have had my dander up by the misrepresentation of the title.
Like Jenny, I've read very little historical fiction surrounding Henry VIII although I always want to (and there sure is an abundance of it). The title would annoy me as well.
Not a great fan of Historical fiction but I still read them once in a while. I love your objectivity in the review. Sometimes titles are meant to draw the reader and has nothing to do with the story. I have read an author's concern on this when his publisher asked him to 'improve' his title and the one the publisher chose had nothing to do with the story at all.
I'm glad you were able to find some redeeming qualities in this book, despite the setbacks of the misleading title and the flashback sequencing.
I don't read much historical fiction these days, but I'll keep your comments in mind if anyone asks about this title.
Zibilee, it sounds as if you enjoyed this book for the most part, in spite of issues with the title and the flashbacks. Thank you for your thoughtful and honest review.
It does seem to be mistitled. I'm glad you got some good out of it despite some of the obstacles. Katherine does sound like a juicy character to write about.
I used to be so obsessed with Henry VIII and his wives, but I don't think I've ever read a (grown-up) fictionalized story of him or any of his wives. Cat Tilney's name sounds familiar to me though -- did she have something to do with Elizabeth I later on?
I didn't fully read your review because I'm going to be reading it for next week. I just browsed to see what you thought. I'm glad you liked it even though there were some issues.
That's frustrating because it sounds like it's titled to get you to buy it. Silly mis-marketing really gets to me be/c sometimes you aren't able to just get over those things for the sake of the book.
I had a similar thought on Women, Food and God. (It really isn't about God at all IMO, if anything, just a touch of spiritual to it). WHY??? do authors do that? In many cases it is the publishers that mess with those titles.
Katherine's story has always seemed to me to be the saddest of all Henry's wives. I'm glad that you were able to enjoy most of the book in spite of the flaws. Thanks for being on the tour.
I see clearly what you make of misleading titles. And well said about almost every historical fiction writer wanting to write about Henry VIII and his ill-fated wives...I get irritated on this too.
I'm glad you were able to enjoy this book despite the ridiculous mis-titling! Henry VIII is surrounded by some amazing people but none more fascinating than his wives and Katherine sound like one of the more interesting, in some ways. If she lived today, I imagine she'd be running a Fortune 500 company or some such business (staffed totally by men, of course!)
I feel badly for Cat Tilney. It doesn't sound like Katherine was very nice too her or appreciative of her. Hopefully I'm wrong about this.
Despite the confusing flash backs and the misleading title, I think I could enjoy this, It's been a while since I have a chance to read this genre. I will be adding it.
Post a Comment